PodcastsGallery iPhone Matters
search


iPhone v Netbook for Gaming? It’s already over…

Posted December 2, 2008 8:46 AM by Chris Seibold
Categories: Hardware Opinions 

imageOver at Seeking ALpha there is an interesting article by Bruce Everiss. Bruce asks (and answers) a very interesting question: When it comes to games which device will win, netbooks or the iPhone?

Many will argue that the question is almost nonsensical. Games aren’t the primary focus of either the iPhone or netbooks. This can be countered by noting that games can be a compelling reason to buy a device. The next objection will be that the iPhone competes against other phones, not netbooks. Hold on there, the iPhone is a phone but at the things heart it is a go anywhere computer. Netbooks are go anywhere computers so the question is valid. So this is one great question. How does Bruce see things shaking out?

So as things stand it looks like netbooks are going to be the biggest gaming machine, by a significant multiple of what the iPhone achieves. In fact the netbook has the potential to be the biggest gaming platform of all. It should easily outperform all home consoles put together. It will be interesting to see this unfold.

If you follow Bruce’s definitions closely he’s absolutely right. The netbook will outdo the iPhone in the gaming market. But that is a specious comparison, he’s compaing a class of device against a single model of cell phone. It is a lot like saying that the Toyota Camry is really great car but the combined total of trucks sold around the world will dwarf the Camry in sales volume. Sure, it is a true statement but it doesn’t mean much. A better question is will the iPhone influence phone design enough to make pones the primary destination of games.

Here the answer is a little more dicey. The Storm has a large screen and an accelerometer as does the G1. Developers have already used accelerometers to great effect in the iPhone and it is easy to imagine them porting games over to similarly specced phones. If the large screen phone becomes ubiquitous, if everyone has one, then iPhone inspired phones will crush netbooks as gaming machines. In Bruce’s articles he talks about how many people will end up with a cheap netbook.

Just about every student after primary level in the western world is going to have one of these. And it is going to be the only computer used in big quantities everywhere in the developing world. So it is going to sell in the hundreds of millions

Which might be true but millions, even hundreds of millions is nothing compared to 1.15 billion cell phones sold in 2007. Before you have a netbook you’ll have a cell phone. And as the tech gets cheaper the features found in smart phones will become standard on every phone. Once that happens, once every phone is a little computer the question won’t be can a netbook beat the iPhone for gaming, the question will be do you a need a laptop at all?

Comments

  1. Well, I did try posting a comment already and it disappeared. So try again.

    I reckon Bruce has no idea.

    The netbook is too big to carry everywhere, and too small to do everything.

    It’s a niche machine that is good for checking emails, writing short documents, and casual browsing of the internet.

    Its small screen means it’s no good for making Powerpoints (which students do more and more these days), or reading PDFs, or serious internet browsing.

    Same problems apply as a games device. Most people would want something they could take everywhere - like and iPhone or DS, or have a full-screen experience a PC or TV gives.

    The netbook will always be a niche device. I considered buying one for my teenager for school, but it made no sense because of its screen (and power) limitations. It’s got no flexibility upscalability of usage. Eg, if school decided he should do a presentation in the form of a movie, a netbook is way underspecced for that purpose. Or what if he gets into graphics stream at school and needs Adobe CS. Again the netbook would be useless.

    These are the sorts of things students will be doing more of.

    The netbook is great for travellers, but too limited for students.So his assertion that every post-primary student will have one is just plain bollocks.

    And since he bases his games domination premise on that, then it is also total bollocks.

    Posted by Chris Howard on December 2, 2008 8:15 PM
  2. hmm, here’s a simple summary of th crap i wrote above:

    Students encounter all sorts of applications and so need a computer that can run pretty much any app they encounter, and to have a screen that makes those apps usable.

    Thus the netbook is not a good choice for students.

    Posted by Chris Howard on December 2, 2008 8:28 PM
  3. And in today’s junk mail from a major electrical retail chain was a compro of netbooks and notebooks. Here’s what it said:

    Netbooks are great for:
    - Surfing the net
    - Instant messaging
    - Sending and receiving email
    - portability

    Notebooks are great for:
    - Photo/video editing
    - CD/DVD burning
    - Gaming
    - Office work

    Oops, eh? They obviously haven’t read Bruce’s article…

    Posted by chris Howard on December 3, 2008 10:32 PM

Submit Comments

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Forums | About | Contact | Press | Privacy

©2007 sterndesign, LLC. All rights reserved. All trademarks and copyrights remain the property of their respective owners. Proudly powered by ExpressionEngine. Dedicated hosting by pMachine Hosting